Back and nerve
Neck and head
Injury and pregnancy
Hands-on care
Machines and therapy
Between visits
What it costs
New patients
Read first
Where we work
Get in touch
Reading
Comparison
The honest answer is that for most back and neck pain the two overlap heavily, and the individual practitioner matters more than the profession on the sign. The old split, where one adjusts and the other prescribes exercise, describes neither accurately any more.
The overlap
The caricature says chiropractors adjust and physiotherapists hand out exercises. In practice most chiropractors now prescribe loading work, because the evidence that it matters is not seriously disputed by anybody, and a great many physiotherapists use manual therapy including manipulation, which they are trained and licensed to do.
Training differs in emphasis rather than in subject matter. Both run for several years at university and both cover anatomy, examination and the musculoskeletal system in real depth. Physiotherapy spreads wider across rehabilitation, taking in neurological and respiratory work, while chiropractic concentrates more narrowly on the spine and on manual technique.
For an ordinary episode of back pain, the practical difference between a careful practitioner in one profession and a careful practitioner in the other is small. What actually distinguishes the care you get is set out under exercise, manual technique and choosing a clinic.
Deciding
Ordinary spinal pain suits either. Post surgical rehabilitation, neurological conditions and breathing work sit with physiotherapy.
Whoever you call, ask what gets examined and whether both manual work and exercise are part of what they do.
Being seen this week by a careful practitioner beats waiting a month for a particular job title.
A proper examination, a plain explanation and a named review point all look much the same in either profession.
Honest limits
Scope is the real difference between them. Physiotherapy covers rehabilitation well beyond the spine, including recovery after surgery, neurological rehabilitation and respiratory work, and in a hospital setting it is the profession you will actually meet. Chiropractic does none of those and concentrates on the spine and manual assessment instead.
Seeing both at the same time for one problem is usually a waste of money and occasionally counterproductive, because two plans pulling in different directions works worse than either one followed properly. If you are going to change, finish or abandon the first course rather than running the two of them in parallel.
Either can be your first point of contact without a referral, and either should refer you onward where the problem is not theirs to treat. That is covered under referrals, red flag symptoms and visit count.
Related
The pages on exercise based care, on manual technique, and on how access works.
The loading work both professions use, and why it carries the outcome.
Learn moreWhat manual technique involves and when it is appropriate.
Learn moreWhy neither profession needs one, and who might ask anyway.
Learn moreThe questions that separate practitioners within either profession.
Learn moreThe symptoms that belong to a doctor whichever you called.
Learn moreWhat an honest answer about duration looks like either way.
Learn moreCommon questions
Anything specific to you belongs in the examination rather than on a page.
Expected to be told chiropractic was better. Instead got an honest answer that for my back it hardly mattered.
Explained that physio covers things they do not, and that my post-surgery knee was one of them.
Told me not to run two courses of care at once, which is exactly what I had been about to do.
Useful comparison. I still had to ring both to find out who could see me soonest.
From the blog
Next step
A proper examination, a plain explanation and a named review point look identical in both professions, and their absence looks identical too.
General information, not medical advice. What applies to you is decided at the examination.